It’s as well to keep in mind what you should not be doing. Do not introduce lots of fresh evidence at this stage, though you can certainly introduce the odd extra fact that clinches your case. Nor should you go on to the ‘next’ issue. If your question is about Hitler coming to power, you should not end by giving a summary of what he did once in power. Such an irrelevant ending will fail to win marks. Remember the point about answering ‘nothing but the question’? On the other hand, it may be that some of the things Hitler did after coming to power shed valuable light on why he came to power in the first place. If you can argue this convincingly, all well and good; but don’t expect the examiner to puzzle out relevance. Examiners are not expected to think; you must make your material explicitly relevant.
The analysis covers the fails and accomplishments of the movie. The writer also gets the chance to express their feelings towards the movie. The cinematography, acting the setting and soundtrack can also be discussed in this section. Ensure that the writing is smooth and clear to comprehend. Facts and opinions should be presented at the same time for the review to seem realistic and professional. Use examples that are descriptive for the plot to come to life. Dialogues can be quoted to give the review life. You can add a few movie review tips such as giving the language a personality. The language should have a style that will reflect the unique perspective that will entertain the reader.